HP xw6600 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics39% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP xw6600 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0A9Ch
Memory26.6 GB free of 32.001 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120920
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 03 '22 at 18:40
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5270
XU1 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
40.6% Average
Memory 56.5
1-Core 50.9
2-Core 109
43% 72.2 Pts
4-Core 140
8-Core 166
20% 153 Pts
64-Core 187
12% 187 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-2048SP
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1206 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
39% Below average
Lighting 46.6
Reflection 56.1
Parallax 77.7
38% 60.1 fps
MRender 54.9
Gravity 56.7
Splatting 41.7
41% 51.1 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 39%
Great: 47%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP35
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 44 60 56 79 88 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
44.8% Average
Read 91
Write 90.6
Mixed 62.5
SusWrite 64.8
57% 77.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
169% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 65GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 33792 MB
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
18.3% Very poor
MC Read 4.9
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 7.5
18% 6.3 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 4
12% 4.17 GB/s
Latency 138
29% 138 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 24%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical xw6600 Workstation Builds (Compare 109 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: HP xw6600 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $135
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback