Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics132% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive149% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
18 months ago, 18 months ago.
MotherboardAsus X99-E WS/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180626
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateDec 03 '22 at 18:35
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2675 v3
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Memory 76
1-Core 57
2-Core 112
51% 81.7 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 452
40% 336 Pts
64-Core 1,144
71% 1,144 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Titan V
Nvidia(10DE 1218) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1912 MHz, MLim: 425 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 527.37
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
132% Outstanding
Lighting 173
Reflection 175
Parallax 242
141% 197 fps
MRender 198
Gravity 217
Splatting 115
138% 177 fps
Poor: 113%
This bench: 132%
Great: 155%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 750 Series NVMe PCIe 400GB-$550
237GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 8EV10135 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 953 970 954 958 965 959 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
149% Outstanding
Read 964
Write 943
Mixed 590
SusWrite 960
194% 864 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 60.3
4K Mixed 35.8
122% 41.8 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 261
DQ Mixed 316
234% 311 MB/s
Poor: 123%
This bench: 149%
Great: 230%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A2 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
60.5% Good
MC Read 28.9
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 22.4
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 13.8
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 88.3
45% 88.3 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-E WS/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 265 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $989
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback