Asus P5KPL-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics6.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive53.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P5KPL-E  (all builds)
Memory2.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20081015
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 03 '22 at 16:09
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Memory 62.8
1-Core 31.7
2-Core 61.6
35% 52 Pts
4-Core 95.7
8-Core 100
13% 97.9 Pts
64-Core 98.3
6% 98.3 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640
MSI(1462 2756) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
6.5% Terrible
Lighting 7.5
Reflection 7.9
Parallax 9.2
6% 8.2 fps
MRender 8.1
Gravity 10
Splatting 8.5
7% 8.87 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.5%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
170GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 104 112 111 117 116 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.3% Above average
Read 227
Write 227
Mixed 211
SusWrite 111
44% 194 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 42.4
4K Mixed 34.1
112% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 36.2
DQ Write 77.6
DQ Mixed 39.3
35% 51 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 128%
Samsung HD161HJ 160GB-$40
33GB free
Firmware: JF100-19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 45 46 45 44 43 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
26.2% Poor
Read 46.5
Write 47.9
Mixed 33.1
SusWrite 44.6
32% 43 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
131% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 42%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
80GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 45 46 45 44 43 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
34.3% Below average
Read 74.5
Write 78
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 44.6
46% 62.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 54%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
209GB free
Firmware: MS1OA7S0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 108 113 112 117 117 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Read 175
Write 170
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 113
89% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
128% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14% Very poor
MC Read 4.5
MC Write 4.6
MC Mixed 3.7
12% 4.27 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 4.4
11% 4 GB/s
Latency 120
34% 120 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5KPL-E Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5KPL-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback