Asus B85M-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	23.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus B85M-E (all builds)
Memory	12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20140106
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 03 '22 at 14:48
Run Duration	231 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G3258-$38 23,497 User benchmarks, average bench 53% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	53.1% Above average	Memory 84.2 1-Core 85.4 2-Core 130 62% 99.8 Pts	4-Core 132 8-Core 124 17% 128 Pts	64-Core 135 8% 135 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209 161,132 User benchmarks, average bench 26% MSI(1462 2848) 2GB CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	23.3% Poor	Lighting 28.4 Reflection 32.2 Parallax 34.9 23% 31.8 fps	MRender 25.3 Gravity 28.4 Splatting 31.8 24% 28.5 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 23.3% Great: 28%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba KSG60ZSE256G SATA 256GB 466 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 134GB free (System drive) Firmware: ABDA4101 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 303 Write 300 Mixed 237 62% 280 MB/s	4K Read 18.1 4K Write 37.1 4K Mixed 23.3 77% 26.2 MB/s	DQ Read 229 DQ Write 163 DQ Mixed 187 142% 193 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 95%
Hitachi HDE721075SLA330 750GB 36 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 669GB free Firmware: ST4OA31B Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 106 Write 110 Mixed 51.9 66% 89.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 167% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 66%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 1TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 142 Write 122 Mixed 80.5 85% 115 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 187% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 0215 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 0420 F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 0420 F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 16GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	49.1% Average	MC Read 15.8 MC Write 17.6 MC Mixed 16.7 48% 16.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.1 SC Write 16.4 SC Mixed 16.6 44% 15.4 GB/s	Latency 73.1 55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B85M-E Builds (Compare 2,953 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B85M-E - $106

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	397x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	323x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	260x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	328x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	202x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	176x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	97x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	92x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	81x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	54x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	37x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	31x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $343

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16