Bytespeed Atlas 157Q

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.46% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive139% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemBytespeed Atlas 157Q  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel LAPQC71A
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200911
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 03 '22 at 08:32
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Memory 77.1
1-Core 120
2-Core 207
76% 135 Pts
4-Core 442
8-Core 652
68% 547 Pts
64-Core 789
49% 789 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Intel(8086 2086) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8935
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.46% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 52.8
Parallax 8.6
5% 22.6 fps
MRender 11.2
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 13.6
9% 10.7 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.46%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 629 388 418 419 424 421 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
139% Outstanding
Read 1,054
Write 920
Mixed 863
SusWrite 450
184% 822 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 68
4K Mixed 51.7
165% 53.6 MB/s
DQ Read 549
DQ Write 270
DQ Mixed 540
366% 453 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 139%
Great: 302%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5700-027.A00G 9905700-026.A00G 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
69.7% Good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 19.9
70% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 29.3
SC Mixed 22
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 86
46% 86 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Atlas 157Q Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

System: Bytespeed Atlas 157Q

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $33
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback