Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	19.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	85.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

18 months ago, 18 months ago.

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6 4,124 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	73.6% Very good	Memory 83 1-Core 107 2-Core 206 75% 132 Pts	4-Core 346 8-Core 525 54% 436 Pts	64-Core 549 34% 549 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M2200 2,904 User benchmarks, average bench 19% Legend(17AA 224D) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1329 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	19.9% Very poor	Lighting 23.8 Reflection 35.1 Parallax 31.4 19% 30.1 fps	MRender 27.7 Gravity 25.9 Splatting 23.3 21% 25.6 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 19.9% Great: 20%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNTY256HDHP-000L7 256GB 1,978 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 177GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT25L6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 187 169 221 229 236 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	85.2% Excellent	Read 455 Write 433 Mixed 318 SusWrite 224 80% 357 MB/s	4K Read 28.4 4K Write 58.9 4K Mixed 36.6 121% 41.3 MB/s	DQ Read 370 DQ Write 330 DQ Mixed 326 251% 342 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 85.2% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC 2x8GB 23,910 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	73% Very good	MC Read 27.8 MC Write 29.2 MC Mixed 21.1 74% 26 GB/s	SC Read 15.2 SC Write 29 SC Mixed 20.7 62% 21.6 GB/s	Latency 75.1 53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 78%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

CPU
Xeon E3-1505M v6IntelBench 70%, 4,124 samples	27x

GPU
HD Graphics P630IntelBench 5%, 3,370 samples	14x
Quadro M2200NvidiaBench 19%, 2,904 samples	13x

SSD
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 238%, 21,542 samples	8x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $69Bench 275%, 495,311 samples	8x
MZNTY256HDHP-000L7 256GBSamsungBench 82%, 1,978 samples	5x

RAM
M471A1K43BB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 23,910 samples	8x
M471A1K43BB1-CRC M471A1K43DB1-CTD M471A1K43BB1-CRC M471A1K43CB1-CTD 32GBSamsungBench 72%, 6 samples	6x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 4x8GBHynixBench 72%, 573 samples	3x