Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	16.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	76.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (83%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 17 months ago.

System	Gigabyte A320M-S2H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF (all builds)
Memory	3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20220428
Uptime	19.2 Days
Run Date	Dec 02 '22 at 18:44
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	83%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104 181,631 User benchmarks, average bench 60% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	57.4% Above average	Memory 67.4 1-Core 106 2-Core 181 67% 118 Pts	4-Core 264 8-Core 333 38% 298 Pts	64-Core 205 13% 205 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% MSI(1462 3413) CLim: 1303 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.07 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	16.3% Very poor	Lighting 0.1 Reflection 11.1 Parallax 86.3 0% 32.5 fps	MRender 63.2 Gravity 71.2 Splatting 45.4 48% 59.9 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 16.3% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk S3 250G 250GB 1,221 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 16GB free (System drive) Firmware: 401100RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 108 72 90 59 59 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	76.2% Very good	Read 445 Write 266 Mixed 209 SusWrite 82.8 55% 251 MB/s	4K Read 30.7 4K Write 68.4 4K Mixed 35.7 128% 44.9 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 239 DQ Mixed 220 188% 279 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 76.2% Great: 105%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 33GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 116 135 132 144 137 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	75.6% Very good	Read 132 Write 145 Mixed 74 SusWrite 131 88% 121 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 75.6% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CM4X4GF2400C16K4 2x4GB 809 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	70.1% Very good	MC Read 26.8 MC Write 26.7 MC Mixed 25.1 75% 26.2 GB/s	SC Read 16.9 SC Write 18.8 SC Mixed 16.8 50% 17.5 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,658 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	818x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	783x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	748x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	773x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	447x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	414x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	347x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $50Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	183x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	169x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	259x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	197x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples	145x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 90% - Excellent

Total price: $418

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16