| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 0.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 27.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| System | Fujitsu LIFEBOOK E752 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | FUJITSU FJNB252 |
| Memory | 5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20140107 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 07 '17 at 20:37 |
| Run Duration | 1449 Seconds |
| Run User | ESP-User |
| Background CPU | 46% |
PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
54.7%
Above average
|
57% 92 Pts
|
23% 181 Pts
|
12% 187 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Fujitsu(10CF 16C1) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4425
|
0.03%
Terrible
|
0% 0.03 fps
|
0% 0.04 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M471B5173BH0-YK0 Kingston 99U5469-045.A00LF 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
48%
Average
|
48% 16.7 GB/s
|
40% 14 GB/s
|
51% 78.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical LIFEBOOK E752 Builds (Compare 125 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK E752
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3320MIntel $199Bench 48%, 30,496 samples | 48x |
| Core i5-3230MIntel $100Bench 49%, 61,311 samples | 16x |
| Core i5-3210MIntel $52Bench 48%, 79,744 samples | 16x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples | 116x |
| HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples | 6x |
| HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples | 3x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 49% - Average | Total price: $227 |