Gigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
18 months ago, 18 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 3  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit färger,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150918
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 02 '22 at 14:51
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Memory 87
1-Core 90.5
2-Core 179
70% 119 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 326
43% 321 Pts
64-Core 272
17% 272 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.12% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 10.7
Parallax 6.1
3% 6.73 fps
MRender 7.2
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.6
4% 4.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.12%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 Evo 250GB-$45
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 352 358 360 356 363 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Read 428
Write 364
Mixed 293
SusWrite 358
81% 361 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 68.2
4K Mixed 36.7
130% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 265
226% 330 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 128%
Seagate BarraCuda SSD ZA500CM10002 500GB
334GB free
Firmware: STAS1024
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 261 420 429 443 445 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Read 394
Write 362
Mixed 346
SusWrite 402
85% 376 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 62.1
4K Mixed 35.2
120% 41.6 MB/s
DQ Read 355
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 224
202% 307 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 113%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA332 1TB
501GB free, PID 1018
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 40 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Read 37.2
Write 39.3
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 40.9
52% 37.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.9
68% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
54.4% Above average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 18
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 17.3
42% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z97X-Gaming 3 Builds (Compare 3,153 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 3 - $169

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $817
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback