Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX706HCB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics54.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive264% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX706HCB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX706HCB
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220812
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 02 '22 at 11:43
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
77% Very good
Memory 65.8
1-Core 149
2-Core 269
86% 161 Pts
4-Core 485
8-Core 628
71% 556 Pts
64-Core 654
40% 654 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 77%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050 (Laptop)
Asus(1043 144C) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2737
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
54.6% Above average
Lighting 70
Reflection 93.1
Parallax 57.2
57% 73.4 fps
MRender 70.7
Gravity 56.3
Splatting 57.6
50% 61.5 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 65%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme HFM001TD3JX013N 1TB
619GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41000C20 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1347 1344 1272 1200 1088 1088 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
264% Outstanding
Read 1,872
Write 1,326
Mixed 1,226
SusWrite 1,223
316% 1412 MB/s
4K Read 58.6
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 79.2
261% 90.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,050
DQ Write 436
DQ Mixed 871
611% 785 MB/s
Poor: 139%
This bench: 264%
Great: 326%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
40.9% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 12
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 12
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX706HCB Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F17 FX706HCB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback