MSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics62.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B51
MotherboardMSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51)  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201231
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 02 '22 at 03:41
Run Duration275 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8600K-$125
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Memory 91.2
1-Core 127
2-Core 254
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 465
8-Core 566
67% 516 Pts
64-Core 734
45% 734 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
62.6% Good
Lighting 78.2
Reflection 87.8
Parallax 77.8
64% 81.3 fps
MRender 78.8
Gravity 76.4
Splatting 68.3
60% 74.5 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0C 1TB
828GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211210WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,394
Write 1,740
Mixed 1,196
323% 1,443 MB/s
4K Read 44.8
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 57.6
210% 76.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,103
DQ Write 854
DQ Mixed 1,008
746% 989 MB/s
Poor: 137% Great: 269%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
236GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 450
Write 452
Mixed 361
94% 421 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 96.5
4K Mixed 54.8
172% 61.6 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 355
268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
124GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 423
Write 469
Mixed 434
99% 442 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 97.7
4K Mixed 53
176% 62.6 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 355
268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 9401
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 26.6
Write 59.5
Mixed 57.9
37% 48 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.1
124% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 97%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 158 159 153 144 159 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 17.5
Write 28.4
Mixed 45.4
SusWrite 152
45% 60.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.3
124% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 97%
ST350041 2AS 500GB
41GB free, PID 0475
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 41 40 43 43 43 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Read 51.9
Write 31.3
Mixed 28.9
SusWrite 41.4
49% 38.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.8
58% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 21%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 503GB
467GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 1.2
Write 1.7
Mixed 1.2
2% 1.37 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1
69% 1.03 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4DFS824A.C8FDD1 859B CT8G4DFS824A.M8FH 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
75.1% Very good
MC Read 29
MC Write 28.9
MC Mixed 22.8
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 25.4
SC Mixed 21.7
59% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51) Builds (Compare 23,011 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51) - $175

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $859
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback