PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 40.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 263% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock B365M-HDV (all builds) |
Memory | 27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20210730 |
Uptime | 0.4 Days |
Run Date | Dec 02 '22 at 02:28 |
Run Duration | 124 Seconds |
Run User | SAU-User |
Background CPU | 49% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-9400F-$96
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
|
79.8%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Zotac(19DA 3546) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
40.4%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
316GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1635 931 791 820 826 803 MB/s
|
263%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$27
683GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 124 124 123 125 122 MB/s
|
73%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BLS16G4D26BFSE.16FD 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
|
76.2%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-9400FIntel $96Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 823x |
Core i3-9100FIntel $130Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 267x |
Core i5-8400Intel $127Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 119x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 170x |
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 162x |
RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 100%, 319,148 samples | 148x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 83% - Excellent | Total price: $336 |