Equus Nobilis

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics20.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive97.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemEquus Nobilis  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK H97M-E
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150515
Uptime6.9 Days
Run DateDec 02 '22 at 02:01
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 96%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
68.3% Good
Memory 89.8
1-Core 88.4
2-Core 172
70% 117 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 288
37% 279 Pts
64-Core 290
18% 290 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Gigabyte(1458 354E) 2GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
20.2% Poor
Lighting 22.7
Reflection 26.4
Parallax 31.2
18% 26.8 fps
MRender 33
Gravity 29.4
Splatting 25.1
23% 29.2 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$49
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 372 370 426 414 302 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Read 353
Write 417
Mixed 369
SusWrite 374
86% 378 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 65.3
4K Mixed 44.3
144% 48.2 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 157
170% 284 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 125%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
465GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 108 109 111 110 108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 95
Write 102
Mixed 65.4
SusWrite 108
68% 92.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 1315 CT51264BA160B.C16F 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
55.2% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 17.3
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 15.3
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 67.5
59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nobilis Builds (Compare 824 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Equus Nobilis

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $387
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback