MSI A320M PRO-VHL(MS-7B07)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 145%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 134%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics155% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive99.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
18 months ago, 18 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B07
MotherboardMSI A320M PRO-VHL(MS-7B07)  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220716
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 02 '22 at 00:41
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G-$123
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Memory 82.1
1-Core 164
2-Core 313
100% 186 Pts
4-Core 571
8-Core 880
90% 726 Pts
64-Core 1,105
68% 1,105 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Gigabyte(1458 37C0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 527.37
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
155% Outstanding
Lighting 206
Reflection 300
Parallax 228
168% 245 fps
MRender 268
Gravity 211
Splatting 161
169% 214 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 155%
Great: 174%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM841 2.5" 7mm 128GB
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM02D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 359 350 351 346 325 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
Read 476
Write 365
Mixed 274
SusWrite 348
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 87.3
4K Mixed 39
147% 53.3 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 282
DQ Mixed 133
152% 262 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
MC Read 33.2
MC Write 30.4
MC Mixed 31
90% 31.5 GB/s
SC Read 27.6
SC Write 41.9
SC Mixed 30.1
95% 33.2 GB/s
Latency 76.8
52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M PRO-VHL(MS-7B07) Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI A320M PRO-VHL(MS-7B07)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $184
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback