Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive184% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemDell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 06RMTY
Memory6.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display2880 x 1920 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220728
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 01 '22 at 14:36
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
12th Gen Intel Core i7-1250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 58.5
1-Core 182
2-Core 331
98% 190 Pts
4-Core 488
8-Core 727
76% 608 Pts
64-Core 856
53% 856 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Dell(1028 0B34) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3301
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Lighting 17.2
Reflection 20.1
Parallax 18.8
14% 18.7 fps
MRender 17.4
Gravity 20.7
Splatting 14.9
14% 17.7 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 14%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme KBG50ZNS512G KIOXIA 512GB
389GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11200107 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 993 877 605 355 421 417 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
184% Outstanding
Read 1,762
Write 1,011
Mixed 1,014
SusWrite 611
244% 1,099 MB/s
4K Read 53.2
4K Write 86
4K Mixed 58.9
202% 66 MB/s
DQ Read 432
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 389
269% 340 MB/s
Poor: 100%
This bench: 184%
Great: 270%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
H9HCNNNFBMBLPR-NEE 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
127% Outstanding
MC Read 43.6
MC Write 56
MC Mixed 48.9
141% 49.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 44.6
SC Mixed 24.1
79% 27.7 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 127%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical XPS 13 9315 2-in-1 Builds (Compare 65 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Dell XPS 13 9315 2-in-1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback