PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 52% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-HD2 (all builds) |
Memory | 5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20151224 |
Uptime | 3.3 Days |
Run Date | Nov 07 '17 at 16:09 |
Run Duration | 267 Seconds |
Run User | RUS-User |
Background CPU | 15% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Athlon II X4 870K
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
|
47%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
52%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
41.4%
Average
|
||||
50.3%
Above average
|
||||
UFD 2.0 Silicon-Power16G 16GB
9GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
8.07%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2133 C11 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 2132 MHz
|
27%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples | 59x |
A8-7650K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 44%, 15,487 samples | 37x |
A8-6600K APUAMD $88Bench 50%, 21,890 samples | 25x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples | 34x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 26x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 17x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 47% - Average | Total price: $227 |