Acer Aspire E5-773

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
18 months ago, 18 months ago.
SystemAcer Aspire E5-773  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire E5-773
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151120
Uptime5.9 Days
Run DateNov 30 '22 at 19:49
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
53.2% Above average
Memory 76
1-Core 71.2
2-Core 132
56% 93.2 Pts
4-Core 177
8-Core 185
24% 181 Pts
64-Core 186
12% 186 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Acer(1025 0983) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4550
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
1.5% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 1.6
1% 1.7 fps
MRender 2.5
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 2.7
2% 2.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.5%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN512HCHP-000L1 512GB
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03L0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 133 134 131 102 104 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
66.8% Good
Read 422
Write 201
Mixed 222
SusWrite 125
54% 242 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 52.1
4K Mixed 26.8
96% 33.8 MB/s
DQ Read 364
DQ Write 208
DQ Mixed 241
192% 271 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 118%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$46
191GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 13,782
Mixed 79.7
4,955% 6,931 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BF160B.C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
52.1% Above average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 17.5
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 17.4
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 88.2
45% 88.2 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E5-773 Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E5-773

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 20% - Poor Total price: $90
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback