Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 11% Tree trunk	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	10.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

17 months ago, 17 months ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron 2957U 2,764 User benchmarks, average bench 38% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	19.4% Very poor	Memory 32.1 1-Core 33.1 2-Core 49.1 24% 38.1 Pts	4-Core 40 8-Core 46.8 6% 43.4 Pts	64-Core 45.5 3% 45.5 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 19.4% Great: 46%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz) 43,454 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Zotac(19DA B239) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.39% Terrible	Lighting 1.6 Reflection 1.3 Parallax 2.5 1% 1.8 fps	MRender 2.7 Gravity 1.2 Splatting 1.9 2% 1.93 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.39% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Foresee 32GB SSD 32GB 5GB free (System drive) Firmware: M1001C SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 26 11 4.2 13 9.3 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	10.2% Very poor	Read 113 Write 25.8 Mixed 24 SusWrite 14.2 10% 44.2 MB/s	4K Read 10.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 1.1 18% 3.97 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT25664BF160B.C8FE 1x2GB 191 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	14.4% Very poor	MC Read 5 MC Write 5.3 MC Mixed 5 15% 5.1 GB/s	SC Read 3.4 SC Write 3.5 SC Mixed 3.5 10% 3.47 GB/s	Latency 243 16% 243 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 30%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 19%

Surfboard

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron 2957UIntelBench 38%, 2,764 samples	1x

GPU
HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 43,454 samples	1x

SSD
32GB SSD 32GBForeseeBench 20%, 1 sample	1x

RAM
CT25664BF160B.C8FE 1x2GBCrucialBench 18%, 191 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16