MSI G41M-P23 (MS-7592)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics14.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive44.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7592
MotherboardMSI G41M-P23 (MS-7592)  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110408
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateNov 30 '22 at 15:59
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550-$161
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.85 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
55.2% Above average
Memory 80.1
1-Core 40
2-Core 94.5
46% 71.5 Pts
4-Core 177
8-Core 180
24% 178 Pts
64-Core 179
11% 179 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Nvidia(10DE 1073) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 526.86
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Lighting 17.6
Reflection 16.6
Parallax 16.2
14% 16.8 fps
MRender 22.2
Gravity 18.3
Splatting 15
15% 18.5 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
BR 256GB 256GB
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2704A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 182 184 196 193 190 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.1% Average
Read 223
Write 200
Mixed 189
SusWrite 181
45% 198 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 43
4K Mixed 12
76% 26.6 MB/s
DQ Read 29.1
DQ Write 65
DQ Mixed 13.8
20% 36 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 161%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
228GB free
Firmware: 1AC01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 102 103 103 103 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 91.5
Write 103
Mixed 57.7
SusWrite 103
65% 88.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.1% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 6.8
20% 7.17 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 6.6
19% 6.67 GB/s
Latency 80.3
50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G41M-P23 (MS-7592) Builds (Compare 47 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI G41M-P23 (MS-7592)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $199
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback