MSI MS-17A1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics45.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive202% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GT73VR 6RE
MotherboardMSI MS-17A1  (all builds)
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180116
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateNov 30 '22 at 14:46
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6820HK
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
64.7% Good
Memory 81.9
1-Core 91
2-Core 133
63% 102 Pts
4-Core 257
8-Core 463
43% 360 Pts
64-Core 472
29% 472 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
MSI(1462 11B7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 526.86
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.3% Average
Lighting 55.1
Reflection 107
Parallax 50.9
45% 71.1 fps
MRender 11.8
Gravity 69
Splatting 76.3
46% 52.4 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
146GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXZ7400Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1145 1234 1351 1391 1378 1370 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
202% Outstanding
Read 1,208
Write 1117
Mixed 456
SusWrite 1,311
230% 1,023 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 78.8
4K Mixed 33.5
140% 49.6 MB/s
DQ Read 873
DQ Write 566
DQ Mixed 677
516% 705 MB/s
Poor: 134%
This bench: 202%
Great: 292%
KingFast 250GB
233GB free
Firmware: N0402C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 249 257 260 260 260 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Read 426
Write 248
Mixed 259
SusWrite 252
66% 296 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 63.8
4K Mixed 34.3
110% 39.9 MB/s
DQ Read 284
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 182
158% 234 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 89%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3U0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 126 126 128 125 126 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Read 128
Write 130
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 126
74% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 75%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 124GB
1GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 152
Write 48.2
Mixed 16.2
68% 72.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.2
91% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFD8213.C16FBD 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2267 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
72.3% Very good
MC Read 26.6
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 22.9
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 28.8
SC Mixed 21.2
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 77.1
52% 77.1 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-17A1 Builds (Compare 748 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat

Motherboard: MSI MS-17A1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback