Asus PRIME H410M-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive47.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME H410M-E  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200727
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 30 '22 at 07:19
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$98
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
74% Very good
Memory 87.6
1-Core 85.4
2-Core 168
68% 114 Pts
4-Core 327
8-Core 528
52% 427 Pts
64-Core 687
42% 687 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 74%
Great: 92%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pichau Gaming PG256X 256GB
128GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H190117D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 250 248 178 212 208 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 405
Write 340
Mixed 259
SusWrite 221
68% 306 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 9.4
4K Mixed 14.8
54% 14.6 MB/s
DQ Read 55.9
DQ Write 9.3
DQ Mixed 19
17% 28.1 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 105%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
141GB free, PID 0901
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 14,284
Mixed 66
4,752% 7,175 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
36% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL8G26C16U4W.8FD BL8G26C16U4B.8FD 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
79.3% Very good
MC Read 32
MC Write 31.6
MC Mixed 22.9
82% 28.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 28.8
SC Mixed 21
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 69.9
57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME H410M-E Builds (Compare 4,591 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H410M-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $201
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback