HP ENVY Desktop

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.19% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ENVY Desktop  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 83C1
Memory24.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170814
Uptime19.3 Days
Run DateNov 30 '22 at 06:30
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
40.7% Average
Memory 52.2
1-Core 44.2
2-Core 91.4
38% 62.6 Pts
4-Core 158
8-Core 262
26% 210 Pts
64-Core 472
29% 472 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
HP(103C 83C1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8854
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
5.19% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 8.8
Parallax 8.7
6% 8.17 fps
MRender 10.1
Gravity 7.2
Splatting 0.3
4% 5.87 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.19%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 4TB-$250
1.5TB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 398 421 411 412 420 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Read 386
Write 367
Mixed 330
SusWrite 411
84% 374 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 51.6
4K Mixed 29.1
96% 33.8 MB/s
DQ Read 342
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 319
242% 325 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 124%
Samsung 860 QVO 4TB
642GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P1225C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 362 385 387 391 392 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 399
Write 366
Mixed 278
SusWrite 381
80% 356 MB/s
4K Read 10.9
4K Write 50.1
4K Mixed 16.6
64% 25.9 MB/s
DQ Read 238
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 206
172% 245 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT16G4DFD832A.C16FP 859B CT16G4DFD832A.C16FP 32GB
2400, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
53.5% Above average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 20.8
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 12.1
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 153
26% 153 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ENVY Desktop Builds (Compare 141 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP ENVY Desktop

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $167
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback