Asrock B560M-C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock B560M-C  (all builds)
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210721
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 30 '22 at 06:19
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$99
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
87% Excellent
Memory 91.5
1-Core 117
2-Core 230
83% 146 Pts
4-Core 444
8-Core 735
72% 590 Pts
64-Core 905
56% 905 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 87%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-XT-$301
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.11.1
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
105% Outstanding
Lighting 110
Reflection 134
Parallax 232
90% 159 fps
MRender 210
Gravity 122
Splatting 175
138% 169 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte G325E500G 500GB
325GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFM80.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,096
Write 1,643
Mixed 1,275
301% 1,338 MB/s
4K Read 42.3
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 59.1
199% 70.8 MB/s
DQ Read 748
DQ Write 690
DQ Mixed 818
587% 752 MB/s
Poor: 100% Great: 255%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Golden Empire CL18-20-20 D4-3200 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.6% Good
MC Read 24.9
MC Write 25.5
MC Mixed 19.1
66% 23.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 20.3
58% 20.4 GB/s
Latency 64.9
62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B560M-C Builds (Compare 3,982 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 100%
Desktop 101%
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock B560M-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $255
The Best.
Intel Core i5-13600K $274Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback