_com1_ NBINF-M7-12R8N

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 119%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics132% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive444% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
System_com1_ NBINF-M7-12R8N  (all builds)
MotherboardStandard GM7AGIM
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220304
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 30 '22 at 03:07
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Memory 52.6
1-Core 177
2-Core 343
96% 191 Pts
4-Core 646
8-Core 1,026
103% 836 Pts
64-Core 1,546
96% 1,546 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 102%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1D05 119A) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.1999
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
21.1% Poor
Lighting 25.6
Reflection 184
Parallax 27.8
21% 79.1 fps
MRender 24.6
Gravity 33.7
Splatting 22.1
22% 26.8 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 21%
Nvidia RTX 3080 (Laptop)
Device(1D05 119A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 512.89
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
132% Outstanding
Lighting 189
Reflection 182
Parallax 179
154% 183 fps
MRender 186
Gravity 134
Splatting 108
113% 143 fps
Poor: 96%
This bench: 132%
Great: 144%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00B00 1TB
824GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7401Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3105 3004 2990 2557 1532 1588 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
444% Outstanding
Read 2801
Write 3,216
Mixed 2,945
SusWrite 2,463
645% 2,856 MB/s
4K Read 78.2
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 116
350% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 1724
DQ Write 1,492
DQ Mixed 1,641
1,221% 1,619 MB/s
Poor: 192%
This bench: 444%
Great: 444%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R2GA3BB0-CQKOL 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
57.6% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 21.2
63% 21.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 11
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 151
26% 151 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NBINF-M7-12R8N Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

System: _com1_ NBINF-M7-12R8N

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback