Gigabyte GA-P55V4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-P55V4  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170914
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateNov 29 '22 at 18:48
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Memory 64.1
1-Core 77.7
2-Core 164
58% 102 Pts
4-Core 245
8-Core 461
42% 353 Pts
64-Core 495
31% 495 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 5600
Gigabyte(1458 1555) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
2.53% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 38.7
Parallax 7.1
1% 15.8 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 5.5
Splatting 6.2
5% 5.97 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.53%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon IT LMT-128L9M 128GB
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HM73001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 226 303 284 320 306 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Read 417
Write 309
Mixed 257
SusWrite 280
71% 316 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 41.2
4K Mixed 24.4
86% 29.2 MB/s
DQ Read 317
DQ Write 232
DQ Mixed 165
153% 238 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 94%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 115 132 132 133 132 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 131
Write 112
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 128
72% 99.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AO1L16BC4R1-BQSS Kingston SNY1333D3S9ELC/4G 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.4% Poor
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 9.4
28% 9.73 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 3.1
11% 3.93 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-P55V4 Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P55V4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $27Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback