Asus P8Z77-V PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics44.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V PRO  (all builds)
Memory0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130813
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateNov 29 '22 at 10:34
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
71.8% Very good
Memory 92.9
1-Core 90.5
2-Core 152
69% 112 Pts
4-Core 276
8-Core 419
43% 348 Pts
64-Core 428
26% 428 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
PwrHis(1787 A480) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
44.4% Average
Lighting 55
Reflection 59.5
Parallax 87.8
45% 67.4 fps
MRender 59.1
Gravity 60.6
Splatting 43.6
44% 54.4 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor M5 Pro 128GB-$130
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.02
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 453
Write 323
Mixed 241
75% 339 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 47
4K Mixed 29.5
102% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 57.3
DQ Mixed 104
82% 118 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 98%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
448GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 105 107 105 106 107 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
65.7% Good
Read 123
Write 94.9
Mixed 85.9
SusWrite 106
76% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
619GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 83 85 83 85 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 99.6
Write 92
Mixed 72.8
SusWrite 83.8
64% 87.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
156% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 67%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65
220GB free
Firmware: 12.01B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 72 69 70 73 73 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
40.9% Average
Read 71.3
Write 72.3
Mixed 49.3
SusWrite 70.7
48% 65.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
180% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1333 C9 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
28.9% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 8.7
MC Mixed 8.4
25% 8.83 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 8.6
25% 8.83 GB/s
Latency 62.3
64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-V PRO Builds (Compare 2,106 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V PRO - $400

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $855
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549WD Black SN850X M.2 4TB $293
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback