Lenovo 90Q30053ES

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive150% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 90Q30053ES  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3728
Memory1.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210218
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 29 '22 at 07:22
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Memory 52.9
1-Core 140
2-Core 254
78% 149 Pts
4-Core 476
8-Core 796
77% 636 Pts
64-Core 963
60% 963 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
Legend(17AA 3728) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.40.30.04
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Lighting 16.6
Reflection 13.8
Parallax 23.3
14% 17.9 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 19.7
Splatting 19.4
13% 14.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron MTFDHBA512QFD 512GB
346GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0013P6LN
SusWrite @10s intervals: 828 742 535 762 701 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
150% Outstanding
Read 1,410
Write 1022
Mixed 905
SusWrite 605
220% 986 MB/s
4K Read 44.6
4K Write 46.3
4K Mixed 40.1
144% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 318
DQ Write 240
DQ Mixed 234
187% 264 MB/s
Poor: 96%
This bench: 150%
Great: 238%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0737
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 35 34 34 37 33 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
26.3% Poor
Read 56.2
Write 33.2
Mixed 31.9
SusWrite 34.8
29% 39 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43EB2-CWE 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
30.1% Below average
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 11.6
MC Mixed 9.8
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 7.5
22% 7.8 GB/s
Latency 150
27% 150 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90Q30053ES Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 90Q30053ES

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback