Asus P7H55D-M EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics22% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive21% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P7H55D-M EVO  (all builds)
Memory1.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100722
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 28 '22 at 23:17
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 650-$70
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.85 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Memory 77.6
1-Core 94.2
2-Core 155
65% 109 Pts
4-Core 186
8-Core 227
27% 207 Pts
64-Core 230
14% 230 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
MSI(1462 2877) 2GB
CLim: 1383 MHz, MLim: 1667 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 474.04
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
22% Poor
Lighting 26.1
Reflection 3.2
Parallax 31.4
21% 20.2 fps
MRender 32.9
Gravity 29.8
Splatting 24.6
23% 29.1 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 32 101 66 21 90 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
21% Poor
Read 117
Write 81.3
Mixed 75.1
SusWrite 63
19% 84 MB/s
4K Read 11.2
4K Write 17.9
4K Mixed 9.6
39% 12.9 MB/s
DQ Read 15
DQ Write 16
DQ Mixed 14.6
11% 15.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 21%
Great: 85%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
898GB free
Firmware: 1AJ100E4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 24 24 26 25 24 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Read 13.4
Write 24.6
Mixed 9.5
SusWrite 24.9
13% 18.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.6
133% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 75%
Innostor Ext. HDD 750GB
666GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 81 80 86 88 92 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
34.4% Below average
Read 82.6
Write 85.4
Mixed 44
SusWrite 85.4
100% 74.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
35.7% Below average
MC Read 11.7
MC Write 10.8
MC Mixed 14.7
35% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 9.1
25% 8.83 GB/s
Latency 85.2
47% 85.2 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7H55D-M EVO Builds (Compare 85 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7H55D-M EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $518
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback