Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics31.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive280% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory56 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220725
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateNov 28 '22 at 17:01
Run Duration256 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D-$297
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Memory 99.5
1-Core 162
2-Core 327
107% 196 Pts
4-Core 647
8-Core 1,003
102% 825 Pts
64-Core 1,423
88% 1,423 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 110%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6700-XT-$480
XFX(1EAE 6601) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 22.11.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.2% Below average
Lighting 28.7
Reflection 39.3
Parallax 49.1
23% 39 fps
MRender 73.5
Gravity 45.8
Splatting 52.9
46% 57.4 fps
Poor: 113%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 129%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$170
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1701 1481 1766 1915 1314 1801 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
280% Outstanding
Read 2220
Write 1,792
Mixed 2,370
SusWrite 1,663
453% 2,011 MB/s
4K Read 62.4
4K Write 53.5
4K Mixed 34.6
167% 50.2 MB/s
DQ Read 976
DQ Write 828
DQ Mixed 890
670% 898 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 280%
Great: 526%
HPT DISK 0_3 21TB
7TB free
Firmware: 4.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 465 449 535 543 415 507 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41% Average
Read 252
Write 169
Mixed 105
SusWrite 486
57% 253 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.8
4% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 41%
Great: 30%
Marvell Raid VD 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: MV.R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 495 441 520 563 381 522 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Read 285
Write 268
Mixed 208
SusWrite 487
71% 312 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 64.2
4K Mixed 41.8
134% 45.6 MB/s
DQ Read 292
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 298
226% 303 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 132%
HPT DISK 0_0 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 4.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 139 88 251 51 174 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 64% Great: 117%
HPT DISK 0_1 5TB
1TB free
Firmware: 4.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 13 16 98 83 52 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Seagate OneTouch HDD 5TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 24 28 30 21 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
21.9% Poor
Read 49.9
Write 25.2
Mixed 27.9
SusWrite 26.2
24% 32.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
114% Outstanding
MC Read 48.5
MC Write 29.6
MC Mixed 41.7
114% 39.9 GB/s
SC Read 31.5
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 41.4
98% 34.2 GB/s
Latency 38.1
105% 38.1 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 114%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING Builds (Compare 23,492 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $645
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback