Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP EliteBook Folio 1020 G1 (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 2271
Memory	4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191002
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 28 '22 at 16:22
Run Duration	182 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	63%

PC Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core M-5Y51 484 User benchmarks, average bench 44% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	27.7% Poor	Memory 39.9 1-Core 34.3 2-Core 59.1 28% 44.4 Pts	4-Core 88.9 8-Core 102 12% 95.4 Pts	64-Core 84.7 5% 84.7 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Core M HD 5300 7,223 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 2271) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171 Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	1.21% Terrible	Lighting 1.3 Reflection 0.9 Parallax 2 1% 1.4 fps	MRender 2.2 Gravity 1.6 Splatting 1.8 2% 1.87 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.21% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU650NS38 240GB 4,162 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 144GB free (System drive) Firmware: S190429a Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 404 Write 380 Mixed 371 86% 385 MB/s	4K Read 20.3 4K Write 26.6 4K Mixed 22.2 73% 23 MB/s	DQ Read 156 DQ Write 103 DQ Mixed 110 88% 123 MB/s
Poor: 43% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida 746448-181 2x4GB 59 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM LPDDR3 1600 MHz Relative performance (0^th percentile)	24.2% Poor	MC Read 8.1 MC Write 9.5 MC Mixed 9.6 26% 9.07 GB/s	SC Read 4.4 SC Write 4.7 SC Mixed 5.6 14% 4.9 GB/s	Latency 203 20% 203 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 24.2% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core M-5Y51IntelBench 44%, 484 samples	3x
Core M-5Y71IntelBench 45%, 3,052 samples	1x

GPU
Core M HD 5300IntelBench 3%, 7,223 samples	4x

SSD
MZNLN256HCHP-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 78%, 2,368 samples	2x
IT L8T-256L9G-HP 256GBLiteonBench 81%, 601 samples	1x
MZNTE256HMHP-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 65%, 1,776 samples	1x

RAM
746448-181 2x4GBElpidaBench 42%, 59 samples	4x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16