Samsung 300E5M/300E5L

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	5.76% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	147% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

17 months ago, 17 months ago.

System	Samsung 300E5M/300E5L (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG NP300E5M-XF3BR
Memory	11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181123
Uptime	3.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 28 '22 at 13:04
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	36%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7500U 139,101 User benchmarks, average bench 48% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	59.8% Above average	Memory 81.6 1-Core 92.8 2-Core 160 66% 112 Pts	4-Core 219 8-Core 238 30% 228 Pts	64-Core 230 14% 230 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia 920MX 8,308 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Sanyo(144D C784) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2686 Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	5.76% Terrible	Lighting 7 Reflection 11.7 Parallax 6.7 6% 8.47 fps	MRender 5.3 Gravity 7.9 Splatting 7.9 6% 7.03 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.76% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 161GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 574 321 320 324 326 325 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	147% Outstanding	Read 1,477 Write 1,222 Mixed 487 SusWrite 365 197% 888 MB/s	4K Read 31.7 4K Write 78.2 4K Mixed 40.8 142% 50.2 MB/s	DQ Read 650 DQ Write 342 DQ Mixed 442 343% 478 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 147% Great: 236%
Toshiba MK7559GSXP 750GB-$118 5,761 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 684GB free Firmware: GN001U SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 101 99 98 96 100 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	53.6% Above average	Read 88.4 Write 98.1 Mixed 19.9 SusWrite 98.4 55% 76.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.5 110% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC Kingston 9905624-033.A00G 16GB 213 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	66.3% Good	MC Read 24.1 MC Write 25.5 MC Mixed 20.8 67% 23.5 GB/s	SC Read 15.1 SC Write 24.2 SC Mixed 21.1 58% 20.1 GB/s	Latency 77.7 52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 66.3% Great: 78%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 300E5M/300E5L Builds (Compare 439 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300E5M/300E5L

CPU
Core i5-7200UIntelBench 45%, 205,332 samples	189x
Core i3-6006UIntelBench 36%, 47,111 samples	103x
Core i7-7500UIntelBench 48%, 139,101 samples	95x

GPU
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	219x
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	105x
920MXNvidiaBench 6%, 8,308 samples	70x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	35x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	22x
WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GBWDCBench 45%, 85,321 samples	8x

RAM
SF4641G8CKHIWDFSEG 1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 2,421 samples	143x
SF464128CKHIWDFSEG 1x4GBUnknownBench 35%, 1,004 samples	80x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	34x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $250	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16