Positivo CI581128TBSEFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics27.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemPositivo CI581128TBSEFI  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo NB50TH
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190816
Uptime5 Days
Run DateNov 27 '22 at 20:53
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400-$155
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Memory 89
1-Core 120
2-Core 240
84% 150 Pts
4-Core 480
8-Core 623
70% 551 Pts
64-Core 640
40% 640 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
Clevo(1558 55A1) 3GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1215
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
27.1% Poor
Lighting 35.1
Reflection 45.8
Parallax 36.7
29% 39.2 fps
MRender 28
Gravity 37.6
Splatting 25.1
24% 30.2 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme CL1-8D128 128GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CT20903 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,272
Write 553
Mixed 690
184% 838 MB/s
4K Read 37.5
4K Write 91.6
4K Mixed 25.5
138% 51.5 MB/s
DQ Read 367
DQ Write 604
DQ Mixed 326
292% 432 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 135%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
92GB free
Firmware: JU000A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 72 74 76 74 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 136
Write 148
Mixed 57.6
SusWrite 74.9
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 0.6
226% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM DDR4 2400 C16 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
81.7% Excellent
MC Read 30.3
MC Write 30.8
MC Mixed 26
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 32.1
SC Mixed 25.1
72% 25.1 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CI581128TBSEFI Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Positivo CI581128TBSEFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $155
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback