PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 27.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 62.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Alienware Aurora-R3 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Alienware 046MHW |
Memory | 9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110525 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Nov 27 '22 at 16:34 |
Run Duration | 129 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 30% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
|
68.6%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8627) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
27.6%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 219 224 234 228 235 MB/s
|
62.2%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
98GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 188 190 192 192 193 MB/s
|
83.9%
Excellent
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM 1600 MHz
|
56.3%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 169x |
Core i7-2600Intel $178Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 94x |
Core i5-2300IntelBench 64%, 19,722 samples | 28x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 49x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 34x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 30x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 61% - Good | Total price: $607 |