Asus TUF Gaming FX705DT_FX705DT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics44% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive159% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
18 months ago, 18 months ago.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX705DT_FX705DT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX705DT
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210128
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateNov 27 '22 at 14:17
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Memory 47.9
1-Core 99.1
2-Core 186
60% 111 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 513
51% 415 Pts
64-Core 542
34% 542 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 10CF) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 128MB, Driver: 20.10.32
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
44% Average
Lighting 57.5
Reflection 61.7
Parallax 50.9
47% 56.7 fps
MRender 41.4
Gravity 49.8
Splatting 48.8
38% 46.7 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44%
Great: 46%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GB
295GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P1MA0V4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 965 946 970 1000 988 472 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
159% Outstanding
Read 986
Write 1,021
Mixed 907
SusWrite 890
214% 951 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 56.6
4K Mixed 39.8
132% 43.4 MB/s
DQ Read 456
DQ Write 639
DQ Mixed 597
438% 564 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 159%
Great: 181%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 Kingston KVR24S17S8/8 16GB
3200, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
61.6% Good
MC Read 23.9
MC Write 24.4
MC Mixed 21.1
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 15.3
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 169
24% 169 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX705DT_FX705DT Builds (Compare 490 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX705DT_FX705DT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback