Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 224%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 270%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics217% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive324% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211019
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 27 '22 at 09:56
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$360
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 82.9
1-Core 172
2-Core 350
106% 201 Pts
4-Core 685
8-Core 1,335
120% 1,010 Pts
64-Core 2,766
171% 2,766 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 106%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
Gigabyte(1458 4043) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4975 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
217% Outstanding
Lighting 320
Reflection 310
Parallax 337
260% 322 fps
MRender 370
Gravity 261
Splatting 194
216% 275 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 217%
Great: 230%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 2TB
919GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4797 2563 1463 1854 1313 1214 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
324% Outstanding
Read 2,121
Write 2,131
Mixed 2,104
SusWrite 2,201
483% 2,139 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 47.5
190% 78.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,096
DQ Write 1,028
DQ Mixed 1,140
834% 1,088 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 324%
Great: 448%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMN32GX4M2Z4000C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
131% Outstanding
MC Read 75.3
MC Write 41.2
MC Mixed 33.7
143% 50.1 GB/s
SC Read 25.8
SC Write 25.7
SC Mixed 37.6
85% 29.7 GB/s
Latency 75.3
53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 131%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,054 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $115

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $935
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback