Gigabyte GA-AX370M-DS3H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics56% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte AX370M-DS3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AX370M-DS3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory20.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 26 '22 at 17:18
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Memory 74.8
1-Core 114
2-Core 226
76% 138 Pts
4-Core 426
8-Core 658
67% 542 Pts
64-Core 851
53% 851 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1386 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.11.1
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
56% Above average
Lighting 72
Reflection 63.8
Parallax 95.9
59% 77.2 fps
MRender 62.5
Gravity 81.4
Splatting 47.8
51% 63.9 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 240GB-$70
146GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X01c62
SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 372 97 11 10 63 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 411
Write 379
Mixed 337
SusWrite 146
71% 318 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 74.2
4K Mixed 32.7
119% 43.9 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 177
135% 178 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$48
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 214 215 214 215 218 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 Adata DDR4 2400 2OZ CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 24GB
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
74.8% Very good
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 24.3
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 28.4
SC Mixed 23.6
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 90.9
44% 90.9 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AX370M-DS3H-CF Builds (Compare 787 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370M-DS3H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $340
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback