Asus M2NPV-VM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics12.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M2NPV-VM  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100602
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 26 '22 at 15:59
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 640-$70
Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
40.5% Average
Memory 58.8
1-Core 42.6
2-Core 82.2
39% 61.2 Pts
4-Core 130
8-Core 135
18% 132 Pts
64-Core 138
8% 138 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7770
Sapphire(174B E244) 1GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 21.5.1
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Lighting 16.3
Reflection 17.9
Parallax 22.6
13% 18.9 fps
MRender 13.9
Gravity 17.2
Splatting 12.5
12% 14.5 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Maxtor S TM380811AS 80GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 31 30 39 39 37 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
25.4% Poor
Read 53.4
Write 46.6
Mixed 22.9
SusWrite 34.8
29% 39.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 42%
Maxtor S TM380211AS 80GB
16GB free
Firmware: 3.AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 43 45 47 47 47 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Read 199
Write 11.5
Mixed 38.6
SusWrite 45.4
54% 73.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
22.7% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 9.1
23% 7.9 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 6.3
16% 5.5 GB/s
Latency 131
30% 131 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M2NPV-VM Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M2NPV-VM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $155
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback