Hp-pavilion AW019AV-ABA e9250t

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	0.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	25.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

18 months ago, 18 months ago.

System	Hp-pavilion AW019AV-ABA e9250t (all builds)
Motherboard	MSI Indio
Memory	10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090917
Uptime	4.6 Days
Run Date	Nov 26 '22 at 15:08
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	40%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-750-$72 43,796 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	58.1% Above average	Memory 81.2 1-Core 70.4 2-Core 129 58% 93.6 Pts	4-Core 202 8-Core 218 28% 210 Pts	64-Core 224 14% 224 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 58.1% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4300 14,988 User benchmarks, average bench 1% MSI(1462 1613) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.9% Terrible	Lighting 0.9 Reflection 2.6 Parallax 1.5 1% 1.67 fps	MRender 1.5 Gravity 0.4 Splatting 2.3 1% 1.4 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.9% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240 GB 240GB 24,911 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 104GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF3000RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 59 45 52 22 20 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	25.1% Poor	Read 229 Write 196 Mixed 102 SusWrite 39.9 31% 142 MB/s	4K Read 13.1 4K Write 14.6 4K Mixed 4.6 34% 10.8 MB/s	DQ Read 112 DQ Write 64.9 DQ Mixed 19.1 33% 65.3 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 25.1% Great: 56%
WD WD20EZAZ-00WGYX0 2TB 13,327 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 485GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 176 181 175 178 177 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	98% Outstanding	Read 163 Write 174 Mixed 79.4 SusWrite 176 108% 148 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 6.2 4K Mixed 0.8 374% 3.7 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 98% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NF-DI 4x4GB 1,608 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM SDRAM 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	39% Below average	MC Read 14.7 MC Write 12.1 MC Mixed 14.1 39% 13.6 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 8.2 SC Mixed 10 27% 9.43 GB/s	Latency 78.4 51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 39% Great: 91%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical AW019AV-ABA e9250t Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Hp-pavilion AW019AV-ABA e9250t

CPU
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	5x
Core i7 860Intel $320Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	4x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	3x

GPU
Radeon HD 4300ATIBench 1%, 14,988 samples	3x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	3x
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	2x

SSD
WDBNCE5000PNC 500GBWDCBench 94%, 17,781 samples	3x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	2x
Ultra 3D 250GBSanDisk $50Bench 85%, 5,775 samples	1x

RAM
XMS3 DDR3 1333 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 45%, 7,510 samples	2x
HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 4x4GBAD80AD80Bench 33%, 4 samples	2x
1600 CL9 Series000 4x4GBUnknownBench 37%, 4 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $72

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16