Gigabyte GA-890GPA-UD3H

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	42.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	72.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-890GPA-UD3H (all builds)
Memory	9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20101124
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 26 '22 at 09:33
Run Duration	174 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	27%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144 43,442 User benchmarks, average bench 53% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	56.2% Above average	Memory 82.4 1-Core 49 2-Core 98.2 50% 76.5 Pts	4-Core 175 8-Core 182 24% 179 Pts	64-Core 182 11% 182 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Zotac(19DA 3595) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 526.98 Performing below potential (48^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42.4% Average	Lighting 52 Reflection 57.2 Parallax 51.8 42% 53.7 fps	MRender 62.3 Gravity 49.5 Splatting 46.4 42% 52.7 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 102GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 175 173 168 167 169 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	72.6% Very good	Read 394 Write 364 Mixed 286 SusWrite 176 68% 305 MB/s	4K Read 34.6 4K Write 71.3 4K Mixed 23.1 120% 43 MB/s	DQ Read 261 DQ Write 220 DQ Mixed 243 181% 241 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 72.6% Great: 124%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 579GB free Firmware: 05.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 64 64 65 65 65 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	53.3% Above average	Read 121 Write 119 Mixed 104 SusWrite 64.2 76% 102 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 203% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 53.3% Great: 76%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$38 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 728GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 118 122 120 121 123 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	62.6% Good	Read 95.8 Write 100 Mixed 102 SusWrite 120 78% 105 MB/s	4K Read 7.4 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.1 330% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 62.6% Great: 106%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB 51 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 59GB free, PID 1019 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 24 25 26 26 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	15.3% Very poor	Read 49.7 Write 31 Mixed 26.1 SusWrite 24.7 41% 32.9 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.7 55% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 15.3% Great: 21%
ST1000LM 024 HN-M101M 1TB 1,107 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 311GB free, PID 0408 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 10 10 10 10 10 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	12.4% Very poor	Read 49.6 Write 29.8 Mixed 27.1 SusWrite 10.3 35% 29.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.8 61% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	32.3% Below average	MC Read 13.6 MC Write 7.4 MC Mixed 12.2 32% 11.1 GB/s	SC Read 6.7 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 8.7 21% 7.2 GB/s	Latency 76.2 52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 32.3% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-890GPA-UD3H Builds (Compare 166 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-890GPA-UD3H

CPU
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples	36x
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	36x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	31x

GPU
Radeon HD 4290ATIBench 1%, 1,024 samples	17x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	12x
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples	10x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x
870 Evo 250GBSamsung $31Bench 101%, 14,082 samples	6x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	4x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	39x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	30x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	22x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $203

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16