Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron B830 3,455 User benchmarks, average bench 43% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	34.5% Below average	Memory 58.8 1-Core 43.8 2-Core 60.2 36% 54.3 Pts	4-Core 62.2 8-Core 61.5 8% 61.8 Pts	64-Core 64 4% 64 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 34.5% Great: 49%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz) 45,735 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 3977) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	0.59% Terrible	Lighting 0.5 Reflection 1.2 Parallax 0.5 0% 0.73 fps	MRender 1.7 Gravity 0.6 Splatting 1.2 1% 1.17 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.59% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 65GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 134 145 148 149 149 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	58.8% Above average	Read 355 Write 351 Mixed 288 SusWrite 177 66% 293 MB/s	4K Read 24 4K Write 37.7 4K Mixed 27.1 91% 29.6 MB/s	DQ Read 131 DQ Write 112 DQ Mixed 123 92% 122 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 115%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown RMT3170MN68F9F1600 04CB 8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	30.4% Below average	MC Read 10.8 MC Write 10.9 MC Mixed 10.4 31% 10.7 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 8.6 SC Mixed 8.4 24% 8.5 GB/s	Latency 131 30% 131 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 39%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron B830IntelBench 43%, 3,455 samples	6x
Core i5-3210MIntel $52Bench 48%, 79,744 samples	1x

GPU
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	6x
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	1x

SSD
850 Evo 120GBSamsung $80Bench 96%, 69,224 samples	2x
BX500 480GBCrucial $38Bench 63%, 83,298 samples	1x

RAM
RMT3160ED58E9W1600 1x4GBRamaxelBench 28%, 4,855 samples	2x
RMT3170MN68F9F1600 04CB 8GBUnknownBench 31%, 3 samples	2x
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 27%, 17,632 samples	1x

Value: 8% - Terrible

Total price: $80