MSI MS-16JA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.49% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive78.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star PL60 7RD
MotherboardMSI MS-16JA  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180315
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateNov 25 '22 at 17:50
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
50.3% Above average
Memory 61.4
1-Core 67.4
2-Core 120
49% 82.9 Pts
4-Core 228
8-Core 224
30% 226 Pts
64-Core 210
13% 210 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
MSI(1462 11CA) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4708
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
5.49% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 30.2
Parallax 6.2
5% 14.2 fps
MRender 6.6
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 9.6
6% 7.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.49%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV512TBN 512GB
341GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0MA020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 371 233 241 246 219 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Read 370
Write 375
Mixed 333
SusWrite 277
76% 339 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 60.7
4K Mixed 31
101% 37.1 MB/s
DQ Read 349
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 321
245% 331 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 97%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
844GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 121 127 128 124 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 72.5
Write 108
Mixed 56.9
SusWrite 124
66% 90.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.7
194% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 16GB
2400, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
63.5% Good
MC Read 23.8
MC Write 26.2
MC Mixed 21
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 20.2
SC Mixed 16.2
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16JA Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16JA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback