Lenovo 82H8

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.73% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive126% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 82H8  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory7 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220115
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateNov 25 '22 at 14:27
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1115G4
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
60.7% Good
Memory 73.9
1-Core 124
2-Core 208
76% 135 Pts
4-Core 277
8-Core 268
37% 272 Pts
64-Core 274
17% 274 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Legend(17AA 3F9C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9664
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
9.73% Terrible
Lighting 10.5
Reflection 12.5
Parallax 13.8
9% 12.3 fps
MRender 14.8
Gravity 16.1
Splatting 13.5
12% 14.8 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.73%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Lexar 256GB SSD
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.19.B3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 682 815 237 247 255 253 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 998
Write 873
Mixed 648
SusWrite 415
164% 733 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 85.9
4K Mixed 42.3
156% 55 MB/s
DQ Read 353
DQ Write 235
DQ Mixed 106
130% 231 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 126%
Great: 258%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
932GB free
Firmware: JU0A2E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 137 134 142 136 139 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 220
Write 20.6
Mixed 82
SusWrite 137
85% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 0.6
217% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 103%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFRA32A.M4FE Hynix HMA851S6DJR6N-XN 12GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
62.1% Good
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 18.9
64% 22.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 15.5
53% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 92.7
43% 92.7 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82H8 Builds (Compare 4,251 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82H8

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback