Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 196%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 238%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics190% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive323% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X570 Phantom Gaming X  (all builds)
Memory57.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200811
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 25 '22 at 06:41
Run Duration239 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$360
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 79
1-Core 179
2-Core 346
106% 201 Pts
4-Core 695
8-Core 1,329
120% 1,012 Pts
64-Core 2,795
173% 2,795 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$700
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 517.40
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
190% Outstanding
Lighting 275
Reflection 253
Parallax 282
224% 270 fps
MRender 317
Gravity 234
Splatting 173
190% 241 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 190%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP1000GM30002 1TB
639GB free (System drive)
Firmware: STNSC014
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3780 1995 969 965 966 965 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
323% Outstanding
Read 1,974
Write 3,768
Mixed 2,198
SusWrite 1,607
541% 2,387 MB/s
4K Read 49.7
4K Write 209
4K Mixed 88.5
299% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 1,374
DQ Write 992
DQ Mixed 1,137
862% 1,168 MB/s
Poor: 177%
This bench: 323%
Great: 492%
Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP1000GM30002 1TB
84GB free
Firmware: STNSC014
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,091
Write 3,601
Mixed 2,257
597% 2,649 MB/s
4K Read 50.2
4K Write 207
4K Mixed 87.3
298% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 1,663
DQ Write 1,358
DQ Mixed 1,457
1,106% 1,493 MB/s
Poor: 177% Great: 492%
Klevv NEO N510+ 240GB
105GB free
Firmware: R1001C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 426 219 56 23 57 32 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 487
Write 411
Mixed 26.8
SusWrite 136
58% 265 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 17
4K Mixed 2.3
50% 14.8 MB/s
DQ Read 143
DQ Write 125
DQ Mixed 1.2
37% 89.9 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 96%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$75
233GB free
Firmware: CC29
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 138 139 138 137 139 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Read 138
Write 106
Mixed 80.4
SusWrite 138
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 113%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
278GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 116 116 113 115 114 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 93.6
Write 97.1
Mixed 77.8
SusWrite 114
71% 95.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
184% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391A4G43MB1-CTD 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
115% Outstanding
MC Read 66.1
MC Write 32.3
MC Mixed 32.9
125% 43.8 GB/s
SC Read 26.1
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 32.5
75% 26.1 GB/s
Latency 82.4
48% 82.4 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 115%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570 Phantom Gaming X Builds (Compare 230 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 171%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 195%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $1,475
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback