HP Z4 G4 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 109%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive96% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
18 months ago, 18 months ago.
SystemHP Z4 G4 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81C5
Memory59.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220422
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateNov 25 '22 at 03:46
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-2145
CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Memory 74.4
1-Core 132
2-Core 264
84% 157 Pts
4-Core 507
8-Core 858
83% 682 Pts
64-Core 1,257
78% 1,257 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 5000
HP(103C 129F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 516.40
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
128% Outstanding
Lighting 169
Reflection 180
Parallax 177
138% 175 fps
MRender 185
Gravity 152
Splatting 147
130% 161 fps
Poor: 122%
This bench: 128%
Great: 137%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAK1T0TBN-1AR1ZABHA 1TB
890GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPC0014
SusWrite @10s intervals: 442 441 425 407 371 370 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
96% Outstanding
Read 391
Write 440
Mixed 369
SusWrite 410
91% 402 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 94.7
4K Mixed 36.6
130% 51 MB/s
DQ Read 361
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 340
255% 340 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 96%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2K40CB2-CVF 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
90.1% Outstanding
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 48.9
MC Mixed 28.3
102% 35.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 22.7
SC Mixed 10.9
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 91.7
44% 91.7 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z4 G4 Workstation Builds (Compare 3,079 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft

System: HP Z4 G4 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback