Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 105% UFO	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 104% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	68.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	13 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170515
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Nov 05 '17 at 21:26
Run Duration	173 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$211 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	82.1% Excellent	Memory 84.7 1-Core 108 2-Core 216 77% 136 Pts	4-Core 427 8-Core 819 74% 623 Pts	64-Core 1,188 74% 1,188 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 82.1% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85EA) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing below potential (55^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	125% Outstanding	Lighting 170 Reflection 201 Parallax 180 138% 183 fps	MRender 132 Gravity 170 Splatting 129 117% 144 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 125% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 362GB free Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 156 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 92 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 51 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 6 (F1) Unknown 99 99 790524177	83.8% Excellent	Read 516 Write 412 Mixed 423 100% 450 MB/s	4K Read 38.1 4K Write 68.5 4K Mixed 21.6 122% 42.7 MB/s	DQ Read 36.6 DQ Write 65.4 DQ Mixed 115 69% 72.2 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 83.8% Great: 134%
Samsung 830 256GB-$261 25,763 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 183GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 15957 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2658 (B1) Unknown 86 86 478 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 50 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 246 (F1) Unknown 99 99 53574758613	68.5% Good	Read 510 Write 377 Mixed 430 98% 439 MB/s	4K Read 21.3 4K Write 56.1 4K Mixed 13.9 80% 30.4 MB/s	DQ Read 20.7 DQ Write 58.4 DQ Mixed 13.4 18% 30.8 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 86%
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42 25,948 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 112GB free Firmware: 2.02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 120 120 4236117 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 84 84 2886218037021 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2980 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 212 (B1) Unknown 0 0 4 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 128 129 545469300864 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 4236117 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 4236117 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 4236117 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 -4294967196 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 8200 (EA) Unknown 0 0 7973 (F1) Unknown 0 0 7973 (F2) Unknown 0 0 10914	61.8% Good	Read 518 Write 109 Mixed 200 60% 276 MB/s	4K Read 25.8 4K Write 59.8 4K Mixed 17.6 93% 34.4 MB/s	DQ Read 166 DQ Write 145 DQ Mixed 10.5 47% 107 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 61.8% Great: 82%
Apple HDD TOSHIBA MK5065GSXF 500GB 626 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 465GB free Firmware: GV201B Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 2200 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 8533 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 72 72 11470 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 7136 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 694 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 934 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 54 54 467484 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 184684249114 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 8244 (DE) Loaded hours 85 85 6147 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 233 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0 (FE) Unknown 100 100 488	44.7% Average	Read 78.5 Write 77 Mixed 74.6 58% 76.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 1.63 4K Mixed 0.26 77% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB-$73 54,616 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	101% Outstanding	MC Read 44.1 MC Write 31.4 MC Mixed 32 102% 35.8 GB/s	SC Read 25.8 SC Write 41.9 SC Mixed 30.8 94% 32.8 GB/s	Latency 72.3 55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 129%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,534 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	419x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	217x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	161x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)