Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 225%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 245%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 114%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics202% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive322% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory29.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220428
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 23 '22 at 16:52
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$245
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Memory 94.3
1-Core 182
2-Core 360
113% 212 Pts
4-Core 711
8-Core 1281
120% 996 Pts
64-Core 2,307
143% 2,307 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 114%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080 12GB
MSI(1462 3896) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 4850 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 526.47
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
202% Outstanding
Lighting 291
Reflection 384
Parallax 298
237% 324 fps
MRender 358
Gravity 246
Splatting 192
209% 266 fps
Poor: 143%
This bench: 202%
Great: 211%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$58
759GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42G1TBKA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1449 893 901 1128 1129 1120 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
322% Outstanding
Read 2,702
Write 2,154
Mixed 1,733
SusWrite 1,103
429% 1,923 MB/s
4K Read 59.8
4K Write 194
4K Mixed 88.5
307% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,228
DQ Write 1,100
DQ Mixed 657
631% 995 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 322%
Great: 372%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
205GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 133 132 136 132 136 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Read 155
Write 113
Mixed 79
SusWrite 134
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
128% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
554GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 133 130 133 126 133 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 104
Write 135
Mixed 74.1
SusWrite 130
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
93% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 106%
Amd-raid WDC WDS240G2G0A- 240GB
190GB free
Firmware: UF450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 117 245 255 336 328 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
202% Outstanding
Read 441
Write 60.8
Mixed 21.4
SusWrite 257
140% 195 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 1.3
1,039% 8.7 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 202%
Great: 160%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3000 2OZ 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
140% Outstanding
MC Read 75.9
MC Write 41.2
MC Mixed 43.1
153% 53.4 GB/s
SC Read 31.6
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 39.9
91% 31.8 GB/s
Latency 59
68% 59 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 140%
Great: 132%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X470-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,450 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $545
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback