PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 52.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 39.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-G41MT-S2PT (all builds) |
Memory | 4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110803 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Nov 23 '22 at 13:24 |
Run Duration | 121 Seconds |
Run User | SVK-User |
Background CPU | 39% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Quad Q8300-$115
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
|
33.7%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 290X-$549
Asus(1043 046A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
52.1%
Above average
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 117 149 156 169 160 MB/s
|
39.7%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
|
18.6%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 41x |
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 30x |
Core2 Quad Q9400Intel $170Bench 46%, 24,176 samples | 25x |
GPU | |
---|---|
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples | 98x |
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 24x |
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples | 18x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 47% - Average | Total price: $166 |