Acer Aspire E5-475G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire E5-475G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer AntMan_SK
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160802
Uptime39.2 Days
Run DateNov 23 '22 at 10:17
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Memory 80.5
1-Core 79.1
2-Core 134
60% 98 Pts
4-Core 217
8-Core 227
30% 222 Pts
64-Core 223
14% 223 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Acer(1025 110F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4708
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
2.36% Terrible
Lighting 2.6
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 2.8
2% 2.7 fps
MRender 3.5
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 4
3% 3.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.36%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
V-gen09sm21ar256sdkm2 256GB 256GB
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0503A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 307 359 359 378 379 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 416
Write 364
Mixed 320
SusWrite 352
82% 363 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 64.6
4K Mixed 24.2
103% 37.9 MB/s
DQ Read 157
DQ Write 277
DQ Mixed 51.5
86% 162 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 100%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
453GB free
Firmware: 2BA30001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 78 79 79 77 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 79.8
Write 68.5
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 79
51% 69.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH Kingston ACR24D4S7S1MB-4 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
53.4% Above average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 16.5
53% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 16
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 79.6
50% 79.6 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E5-475G Builds (Compare 592 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E5-475G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback