SZMZ X99M-G2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics85.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive218% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
24 months ago, 18 months ago.
SystemSZMZ X99M-G2  (all builds)
MotherboardSZMZ X99M-G2
Memory20 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200811
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateNov 23 '22 at 03:04
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 71.3
1-Core 94
2-Core 188
66% 118 Pts
4-Core 373
8-Core 750
66% 561 Pts
64-Core 1449
90% 1449 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Lighting 107
Reflection 114
Parallax 104
87% 108 fps
MRender 95.6
Gravity 104
Splatting 99.5
82% 99.9 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$75
341GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1142 675 700 688 675 694 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
218% Outstanding
Read 2,028
Write 2,157
Mixed 1,756
SusWrite 762
376% 1,676 MB/s
4K Read 46.4
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 64.3
214% 75.3 MB/s
DQ Read 676
DQ Write 397
DQ Mixed 574
417% 549 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 218%
Great: 297%
Kingston SA400S37480GB 480GB
40GB free
Firmware: 1219
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 225 26 18 57 18 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Read 482
Write 230
Mixed 304
SusWrite 95.1
62% 278 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 79.6
4K Mixed 15.8
121% 44.7 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 282
DQ Mixed 19.5
78% 169 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 94%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61
438GB free
Firmware: ACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 129 132 132 132 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
74.7% Very good
Read 128
Write 145
Mixed 26
SusWrite 132
78% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
166% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 108%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
544GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 173 175 174 174 174 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 164
Mixed 98.2
SusWrite 174
111% 151 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
229% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 109%
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23
198GB free
Firmware: 2F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 105 114 112 113 112 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 102
Write 105
Mixed 37.8
SusWrite 111
65% 89.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M378A1K43BB2G3A141 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
60.2% Good
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 20.3
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 16.7
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 98.5
41% 98.5 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99M-G2 Builds (Compare 131 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: SZMZ X99M-G2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $160
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback