| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 19.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 88.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Viglen VIG440J (all builds) |
| Motherboard | FUJITSU D3128-B2 |
| Memory | 10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 11 |
| BIOS Date | 20131014 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 22 '22 at 16:24 |
| Run Duration | 125 Seconds |
| Run User | PAK-User |
| Background CPU | 17% |
PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
|
71.4%
Very good
|
65% 111 Pts
|
46% 360 Pts
|
25% 406 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Device(7377 0000) 3GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 456.71
|
19.8%
Very poor
|
18% 26.3 fps
|
23% 28.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 72 70 72 75 74 MB/s
|
88.5%
Excellent
|
76% 340 MB/s
|
149% 50.4 MB/s
|
242% 342 MB/s
|
|
|
52.4%
Above average
|
64% 86.2 MB/s
|
199% 1.5 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M393B5273DH0- 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
63.2%
Good
|
67% 23.4 GB/s
|
38% 13.3 GB/s
|
57% 70.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical VIG440J Builds (Compare 6 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Viglen VIG440J
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples | 2x |
| Xeon E5-1620 v2Intel $345Bench 71%, 10,301 samples | 1x |
| Xeon E5-1650 v2Intel $635Bench 76%, 10,921 samples | 1x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples | 1x |
| Quadro 5000NvidiaBench 10%, 751 samples | 1x |
| GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 49% - Average | Total price: $477 |